I'm ashamed to admit that the length of a song is something that ultimately affects what music I listen to. I know it shouldn't, but "I'm only human," and it does. I believe the root is found in my old Dream Theater fanboy self. I learned of all these elements of "progressive" music from Dream Theater members talking about their own group. They'd either make reference to Six Degrees of Inner Turbulence, which isn't even a song, or they would claim that the average Dream Theater song is about 10 minutes long, which isn't the case. Its 7:33; yes, I did calculate it, and yes, I'm ashamed to admit it. This perception is one I'm trying to lose, but one that doesn't want to be lost. I owned Close To The Edge for months before listening to it. I somehow got the idea what a title track of 18 minutes is too good for my ears, so I put off listening to the album at all, which turned out to be a mistake. I initially looked up on The Decemberists because they wrote some long songs, like The Crane Wife and The Island. I looked down up bubblegum-era Beatles because their songs were always 2 minutes and something long. I didn't bother listening to Frank Sinatra because he just sang 3-minute pop songs, which, being 3 minutes long, were inferior to 10-minute prog epics. And somehow Death Cab For Cutie didn't contribute anything to music because they wrote shorter songs. Only when I got past that fact did I learn that quality and song length aren't remarkably correlated.
The only time I listen to music without knowing the length of the song is while watching concert DVDs, which is what brought me here. I watched Joe Satriani's Live In San Francisco DVD and one of the highlights was a bass solo from Stu Hamm that I remember as being well-developed and fun. What I didn't learn until skimming YouTube today was that it is more than 6 minutes long. It didn't seem that long while watching it without knowing the length. My interest didn't waiver and I didn't ever think "wow, this guy has been playing forever" or "this part is too repetitive." When I came across it on YouTube, I realized that if I hadn't already seen it, I would have noticed the 6:04 timestamp and skipped it. Unaware that it had multiple parts to it and was actually decent, I let something from my past self prevent me from enjoying music that interests me.
Showing posts with label prog epics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label prog epics. Show all posts
Saturday, July 4, 2009
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)